Just two weeks ago Democratic presidential hopefuls seemed to be taking turns laying the foundation for potentially very effective anti-Democratic ads – seemingly playing into President Trump’s characterizations of them as supporting socialized medicine, accepting open borders and appearing to embrace the “squad” of four very progressive Democratic congresswomen.
Now, a little more than a week later, in response to the horrible massacres of predominantly Hispanic customers at an El Paso Walmart, and predominantly African Americans in Dayton, the Democratic candidates have decided to be more explicit than ever in accusing Trump of being a “white nationalist” seeking to blame him for the two attacks.
I disagree with these observers.
More from Opinion
Most presidential campaigns – regardless of party – tend to follow Richard Nixon’s campaign strategy: win the primaries by moving as far-right [for Republicans, left for Democrats] and then move as fast as you can to the center for the general election.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER
But we’ve seen what happens when Democrats have tried to follow that dictum this year – they’ve come closer to painting themselves into a progressive corner – on immigration, health-care, and even gun control, that can leave themselves vulnerable to Republican attacks after a nominee is chosen. Not only do they risk alienating many potentially anti-Trump voters, but also risk dividing the party itself.
Indeed, a number of folks have described how despite the solid popular vote lead that almost all Democratic candidates appear to currently have over President Trump, their stand on those issues could cause them challenges winning the essential states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and, especially, Wisconsin.
But consider the two apparently most effective campaigns for the nomination – Vice President Joe Biden’s and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren. While Biden had a very solid lead prior to entering the race, his support grew significantly after his announcement video focused almost exclusively on a focused anti-Trump message.
In the wake of the two El Paso and Dayton murders, almost all of the Democratic hopefuls – many of whom had explicitly said they have been seeking to campaign without mentioning the president’s name – have joined the “#Resist” bandwagon. For example, former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke, from El Paso, gave a seemingly off-the-cuff, expletive-laden, interview, accusing the president of being racist and the press of failing to report that. Others have joined in.
While Democrats disagree on how to handle immigration, whether to support “Medicare-for-All,” and what constitutes “common-sense gun control,” the one thing that appears to unite them is opposition, even hatred of Donald Trump. Indeed, according to the latest Fox News poll, fully three-fourths of Democrats want him impeached.
While Democrats disagree on how to handle immigration, whether to support “Medicare-for-All,” and what constitutes “common-sense gun control,” the one thing that appears to unite them is opposition, even hatred of Donald Trump.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Will it be as effective in the general election campaign? I don’t know, though it may be easier to follow Nixon’s dictum, and race back to the center on that issue than on the others.
The bigger fear is what happens to our country – with a large group (roughly 40 percent) that strongly supports almost everything the president does and says – and an apparently equally large group (roughly 40 percent) that considers him racist – and about 20 percent of folks in the middle who will be called upon to referee between those two extremes.